• YouTube
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Podcast

Recent Posts

  • Today on “Kresta in the Afternoon” – July 22

    Talking about the “Things That Matter Most” on July 22, 2014

     4:00 – Mackerel Snappers: How to explain even the toughest teachings about God and his Catholic Church

    Where is Purgatory in the Bible? Why does the Catholic Church oppose in-vitro fertilization? Catholics were once labeled “mackerel snappers” because of their regular consumption of fish on Fridays. Abstinence from meat is just one of many often misunderstood Catholic teachings. Rather than shy from that old derogatory nickname, Spencer Allen claims it as a badge of pride as it explains and defends the teachings of God’s one, true Church. Spencer is here to offer systematic explanations invaluable in their own defense and practice of the faith.

     4:40 –Exposing the Lie: Marriage and Manipulating the Media

    Many of you have probably seen the headline “Marriage Not An Antidote to Poverty” which has been all over the news.  As you might have guessed, there is more to the story.  The truth is, the “study” is actually a position paper that presents no new data and, in fact, supports a foundational assertion of the marriage movement’s campaign against poverty; namely, that to be effective as an anti-poverty initiative, marriage must come before baby. Dr. Greg Popcak joins us to discuss the facts behind this latest PR campaign against marriage.

    5:00 – How to Wolf-Proof Your Kids: A Practical Guide for Keeping Your Kids Catholic

    Gary Michuta has long worked in the field of apologetics and evangelism. A few years ago, he gathered his experiences and ideas into a series of talks titled “How to Wolf-Proof Your Kids.” Catholic parents around the country were extremely enthusiastic about the talks. Parents frequently approached him after his talks and encouraged him to put the information into book form because their own experiences so closely mirrored what he said. Some of these parents would proceed to share their own heart-breaking stories when their child had been pulled out of the Church. These discussions with parents spurred him to act and the result is the book How to Wolf-Proof Your Kids: A Practical Guide for Keeping Your Kids Catholic. Gary joins us to discuss it and answer your questions.

  • Federal appeals court deals blow to health law

    via ABC News

    A federal appeals court delivered a serious setback to President Barack Obama’s health care law Tuesday, potentially derailing billions of dollars in subsidies for many low- and middle-income people who bought policies.

    In a case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, a group of small business owners argued that the law authorizes subsidies only for people who buy insurance through markets established by the states — not by the federal government.

    A divided court agreed, in a 2-1 decision that could mean premium increases for more than half the 8 million Americans who have purchased taxpayer-subsidized coverage under the law. The ruling affects consumers who bought coverage in the 36 states served by the federal insurance marketplace, or exchange.

    The majority opinion concluded that the law, as written, “unambiguously” restricts subsides to consumers in exchanges established by a state. That would invalidate an Internal Revenue Service regulation that tried to sort out confusing wording in the law by concluding that Congress intended for consumers in all 50 states to have subsidized coverage.

    The administration is expected to appeal the ruling.

    The issue is crucial to the success of the health law because most states have been unable or unwilling to set up their own exchanges. The inaction stems in many instances from opposition by Republican governors to the Affordable Care Act.

    The small business owners filing the lawsuit say the tax credits enacted by Congress were intended to encourage states to set up their own health benefit exchanges and that the penalty for not doing so was withdrawal of tax credits for lower-income residents.

    Supporters of the act say the purpose of the tax credit was not to promote the establishment of state exchanges, but rather to achieve Congress’s fundamental purpose of making insurance affordable for all Americans.

    The case revolves around four words in the Affordable Care Act, which says the tax credits are available to people who enroll through an exchange “established by the state.”

    The challengers to the law say a literal reading of that language invalidates the IRS subsidy to people in the federal exchanges. The opponents say that people who would otherwise qualify for the tax credits should be denied that benefit if they buy insurance on a federally facilitated exchange.

    “It is implausible to believe that Congress gave the IRS discretion to authorize $150 billion per year in federal spending, particularly when Congress had directly spoken to this issue,” the challengers to the IRS subsidy said in a court filing. “Major economic decisions like these — indeed, any decisions granting tax credits — must be made unambiguously by Congress itself.”

    The Obama administration and congressional and state legislative supporters of the Affordable Care Act say the challengers are failing to consider the words of the statute in its entirety.

    “Congress did not provide that the tax credits would only be available to citizens whose states set up their own exchanges,” says an appeals court filing by congressional and state legislative supporters of the Affordable Care Act. Congressional lawmakers and state legislators supporting the act said that limiting the subsidies to state exchanges could destabilize important aspects of the law, such as the individual mandate requiring most people to buy insurance.

    The judges on the case were Thomas Griffith, an appointee of President George W. Bush; A. Raymond Randolph, an appointee of Bush’s father; and Harry Edwards, an appointee of President Jimmy Carter, who dissented.

    A lower court had ruled that the law’s text, structure, purpose, and legislative history make “clear that Congress intended to make premium tax credits available on both state-run and federally-facilitated Exchanges.”

    But the appeals court concluded the opposite — that the letter of the law “unambiguously restricts” the law’s subsidies to policies sold through exchanges established by the state.

  • Kresta in the Afternoon – July 21, 2014 – Hour 1

    Kresta in the Afternoon – July 21, 2014 – Hour 1

    + Segment #1 of 3

    What is Russia Trying to Hide?

    • Description: Malaysian Airlines flight 17 was shot out of the sky on Thursday near the Ukraine-Russia border. The investigation is just beginning but many world leaders suspect Russian rebels in Ukraine, possibly with the support of the Russian military, are responsible for the attack. Russian rebel fighters in the region have been criticized for removing evidence and tampering with the crash site. President Obama has demanded to know what the fighters are trying to hide and has requested that Russia use its enormous influence to persuade the fighters to cooperate with the investigation. Leon Aron, Resident Scholar and Director of Russian Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, joins us.
    • Segment Guests:

    + Segment #2 of 3

    Digging out of the Dungeon of Self: On the Fundamental Evil of Fragmentation

    • Description: Our society is becoming increasingly more isolated. Technology allows us to spend our entire day looking at a screen without ever interacting with the people around us. Schoolteachers are finding it increasingly difficult to hold their students’ attention for even an entire lecture, much less an entire day. We are losing our ability to truly see, hear, and understand. This problem is paralleled in the fight for the unborn—if we can’t even see our relation to the family member sitting across the dinner table, how will we ever see our relation to the inner-city teen mom’s unborn child? Edmund Miller, president of Guadalupe Partners, a sidewalk counseling ministry in Detroit, and a teacher at Spiritus Sanctus Academy, joins us.
    • Segment Guests:
      • Edmund Miller
        President of Guadalupe Partners, sidewalk counseling ministry in Detroit. Teacher at Spiritus Sanctus Academy
      • Resources:

    + Segment #3 of 3

    Digging out of the Dungeon of Self: On the Fundamental Evil of Fragmentation

  • Kresta in the Afternoon – July 21, 2014 – Hour 2

    Kresta in the Afternoon – July 21, 2014 – Hour 2

    + Segment #1 of 3

    Correcting Catholic Blindness: What Catholic Social Teaching Doesn’t Know

    • Description: Modern Catholic Social Teaching tells us to approach political and economic challenges by seeing, judging, and acting. We are to look at the situation through the eyes of Christ, free from our own ideologies. However, this approach entails choices regarding what we look at and how deep we examine it, thus limiting our field of vision. Dr. Sam Gregg of the Acton Institute argues that the imperatives of Catholic social doctrine still apply because they are grounded in integral human development. He believes that it’s possible to adhere to these principles and also widen the scope of our views on economic life. Sam joins us.
    • Segment Guests:

    + Segment #2 of 3

    Correcting Catholic Blindness: What Catholic Social Teaching doesn’t know

    + Segment #3 of 3

    Cant Pass as Legislation? Then I'll Issue and Executive Order. President Obama Signs ENDA Executive Order – No Religious Exemption

    • Description: For 20 years, Congress failed to pass the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), suggesting that the legislation must be burdened with more than just a few controversial features. President Clinton and President Bush respected the right of the legislature not to pass the bill, but President Obama is different: he said he signed it because the bill had stalled in the Congress. Why we need the Congress at all he did not explain. The president not only issued an Executive Order imposing ENDA, he chose to sign that version of the bill which fails to grant a religious exemption. We talk about it with Erik Stanley of Alliance Defending Freedom.
    • Segment Guests:
      • Eric Stanley
        Serves as senior legal counsel with Alliance Defending Freedom at its Kansas City Regional Service Center in Kansas, where he heads the Alliance Defending Freedom Pulpit Initiative to empower pastors across the nation to speak freely from their pulpits on all matters of life, including how Scripture and church teaching have application to candidates and elections
      • Resources:
  • Muslims in Baghdad Express Solidarity With Christians

    via Aleteia 

    A group of about 200 Muslims joined Christians in solidarity in front of the Chaldean Church of St. George Sunday to condemn the attacks on the Christian community in Mosul carried out by the Islamic State.

    Some Muslims held up signs or wore shirts with the words “I am Iraqi, I am Christian,” written on them. Others marked themselves with a “nun,” the first letter of the Arabic word for Christian, “Nasrani” or Nazarene. The Islamic State has been putting “nuns” on Christian property marked out for seizure.

    The Chaldean faithful who joined them after Mass sang the national anthem along with them, as Patriarch of Babylon of the Chaldeans Louis Raphael I Sako thanked them: “This brings hope for a new Iraq. I think especially of the young people, who have the task and the duty to change the situation.”

    During the Mass, Patriarch Sako said that Islamic State militants who drove Christians out of Mosul were worse than Mongol leader Genghis Khan and his grandson Hulagu who ransacked medieval Baghdad, according to Reuters. “The heinous crime of the Islamic State was carried out not just against Christians, but against humanity,” he said. “This has never happened in Christian or Islamic history. Even Genghis Khan or Hulagu didn’t do this.”

    Hulagu Khan led a Mongol army which sacked Baghdad in 1258, killing tens of thousand of people, destroying a caliphate which lasted nearly 600 years and leaving the city in ruins for centuries.

    According to the patriarch, it “is a shame and a crime to force innocent people from their homes and confiscate their properties because they are ‘different,’ because they are Christians. The whole world must rebel against these abominable acts.”

    Christians, he said, “love Muslims and consider them our brothers and sisters; they must do the same. We are all equal in dignity, all citizens of the same country. We must unite to create a new Iraq.”

    Outside, Christians prayed the Our ​​Father and the Muslims the sura al Fatiha, the summary of the Muslim creed from the Quran.

    Meanwhile, Auxiliary Bishop of the Chaldean Patriarchate Shlemon Warduni called for an international response. “The world must act, speak out, consider human rights,” he said, adding that the Iraqi state was weak and divided and Muslim leaders had remained silent.

    “We haven’t heard from clerics from all sects or from the government,” he told Reuters on Sunday. “The Christians are sacrificed for Iraq.”

    Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki condemned the treatment of the Christians and what he described as attacks on churches in Mosul, saying it showed “the extreme criminality and terrorist nature of this group,” according to Reuters. He said he instructed a government committee set up to support displaced people across Iraq to help the Christians who had been made homeless, but did not say when the army might try to win back control of Mosul.

    “What is being done by the Daesh terrorist gang against our Christian citizens in Ninevah province, and their aggression against the churches and houses of worship in the areas under their control reveals beyond any doubt the extremist criminal and terrorist nature of this group,” al-Maliki said in a statement released by his office, using the Arabic acronym for the Islamic State group.

    U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon strongly condemned “the systematic persecution of minority populations in Iraq by Islamic State and associated armed groups,” in particular the recent threats against Christians in Mosul, according to a statement released Sunday.

    He also said the U.N. would intensify its efforts to address the urgent humanitarian needs of the displaced.

    The Islamic State group claimed responsibility late Saturday for four bombings in Baghdad which were among a string of attacks that killed at least 27 people earlier in the day. It said two of the attacks were carried out by suicide bombers — Abu al-Qaaqaa al-Almani and Abu Abdul-Rahman al-Shami. The names indicate they were German and Syrian respectively.
    The authenticity of the Islamic State group’s statement could not be independently verified, but it was posted on a militant website frequently used by it.
    One Christian who left Mosul last week described how he fled with his family when he learned of the Islamic State deadline. “We gathered all our belongings and headed for the only exit. There was a checkpoint on the road and they were stopping cars there,” 35-year-old Salwan Noel Miskouni said, according to a Reuters report.

    Read More

  • On Poverty: Erroneous Ideas on how to Help the Poor are a Major Cause of the Problem

    via Aleteia

    by Fr. James V. Schall, S.J.

    james schallAt Jerusalem, St. Paul was admonished to be “mindful of the poor.” He was “happy” to do so. He also thought he should work so he would not be a burden on others. We are often advised to “identify” ourselves with the poor. Is a poor man helped or insulted when someone tells him that he wants to “identify” with him? A well-off man who “identifies” with the poor will seem condescending to the poor man who suspects that the man is merely pretending. The poor want not to be poor. They are not helped by those who, even with the best of intentions, merely identify or pretend.

    While some think that everyone ought to be poor in principle as riches are dangerous, half the turmoil in the world concerns controversy over the two questions: “Why are the poor ‘poor’?” and “How do we not be poor?”. Major causes of poverty arise from unworkable or erroneous ideas about how to help the poor. “Wanting” to help the poor is not necessarily to help them. It depends on the workability of what we advise, suggest, or endow.

    Poverty is not merely a question of need but of ideas. Indeed, need-povertypoverty is usually a product of poverty caused by lack of ideas. Well-intentioned ideas, however, do not in practice often work to alleviate poverty. Intention and good will are not enough. All the “identification” with the poor in the world will not help them unless the identifiers know, and the poor know, what causes them to be not poor. If the poor knew this reason and were disciplined enough to follow it, they would soon not be poor. The vast reduction of poverty in the world in recent decades has occurred because of this knowledge and the discipline it takes to put it into practice. Though we need public order and law, the worst way to help the poor is to turn over the task of helping them to a government and its bureaucracy. This move will usually result in a political control of the poor. The poor will continue to be poor but now dependent on a dole of government. This way is little better than a modern form of serfdom.

    We are also told that the poor would “always” be with us. Certainly there will always be those who think that, relative to others, they are deprived of what others have and of what they are “owed”. They think themselves to be comparatively poor even if they possess many things. But modern economists do not think this is wholly true—that poverty cannot be basically eliminated. In fact, the number of poor in the world, as a percentage of the world’s population, has rapidly declined in recent decades. China, India, and much of the world have learned not to be poor. The face of poverty is a rapidly changing thing. The poor in many countries are rather well off compared to poor in more destitute countries. Poverty is thus often relative to what we are comparing it with.


    The question of poverty cannot be totally disassociated from the question of envy. Envy allows us to feel poor when someone more successful than we are appears next door. And not everyone wants to be or needs to be rich. A sufficiency or comfortable wealth is often to be preferred to much wealth. One can be very wealthy without being unjust. He can in fact be most generous to others. Wealth generates wealth. Savings when invested can lead to wealth. The generation of new wealth is always to be preferred to a theory of redistribution of existing wealth. The usual effect of confiscating and redistributing the goods of the wealthy is to make everyone poor. Through unwise taxes and other disincentives to penalize those who produce new ideas and goods is to undermine the motives for producing new ideas and products. Man has to learn and distribute most of what he needs and wants.

    Paul also said that he who would not work, “neither let him eat.” This blunt admonition sounds cruel to us today. We routinely feed those who will not work. They have a “right” to be taken care of, whatever they do. We take great pains to see that everyone eats whether he works or not. Yet, the problem of what are known as “freeloaders,” —that is those who know how to work a system without actually doing anything—plagues every economy. In the modern welfare state, not a few have found that, by government largess, they can live better by not working than they can by working. Unemployment becomes a function of the ability of receiving more income from not working than from working.

    Read More

  • Science Proves Natural Law

    via the National Catholic Register

    by Agnes Penny

    I don’t usually read Smithsonian magazine.
    In fact, to be honest, I never read Smithsonian.
    However, recently, a kind neighbor dropped off a stack of Smithsonian magazines, and as I leafed through them briefly, something on the cover of the January issue caught my eye: a huge photo of a baby with the provoking words “The New Morality.”
    As a Catholic living in what has been called the post-Christian era, I naturally felt my interest piqued at what a secular magazine would say about morality. Moreover, as a mother, I felt the irresistible attraction to all things pertaining to babies.
    I opened the magazine.
    What I found was scientific confirmation of our faith. The actual article, toddlersentitled “Born to Be Mild,” by Jill Greenberg, detailed recent findings by several prestigious research labs regarding the moral consciousness of babies and toddlers. For babies 3 to 18 months of age, some experimenters put on a puppet show involving two characters, one nice and one mean.
    Babies 6 months old and up watched the same puppet show several times, and then they were offered a graham cracker by both characters.
    Overwhelmingly, the youngsters accepted the cracker from the nice character. The 3-month-olds, obviously, could not reach for a graham cracker, so scientists timed how long these babies looked at each character; and, once again, the babies overwhelmingly preferred the good character.
    The article then went on to chronicle various experiments with toddlers, testing their altruistic interest in helping others.
    As a mother, I was not surprised to read that these experiments revealed toddlers’ desire to help others, even when helping meant inconvenience or sacrifice to themselves and when the people they were helping did not ask for help or even appear to notice they needed help.
    The researchers’ goal was to discover if people are born with a sense of morality, which is why they included such young babies: so that they could test children before they’ve absorbed the values and social norms of their families.
    These babies, one after another, surprised researchers, who believed morality was taught, rather than innate — disproving, Greenberg says, both the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau — that man is born a “perfect idiot” — and that of Thomas Hobbes: that man is born a selfish beast.
    To me, however, all these experiments echoed the scriptural passage where we are told of “the law written in their hearts, their conscience bearing witness to them” (Romans 2:15).
    Catholics do not need scientific proof that all people have the natural law written in their hearts from birth; we’ve known it all along, from the Bible to the constant teaching of the magisterium of the Church.
    St. Thomas Aquinas wrote in the Middle Ages, “The natural law is nothing other than the light of understanding placed in us by God; through it, we know what we must do and what we must avoid. God has given us this light or law at creation.”
    Even earlier, St. Augustine spoke of “the law that is written in the human heart.”
    More recently, the Catholic Catechism restates this perennial truth: “The natural law, present in the heart of each man and established by reason, is universal in precepts, and its authority extends to all men” (1956).
    Of course, the researchers in the Smithsonian article did not attribute the infants’ moral awareness to God’s imprinting his law on their hearts.
    On the contrary, they attributed the babies’ moral consciousness to evolution; in fact, University of California at Berkeley researcher Alison Gopnik refused to describe the babies’ responses as “moral,” stating, “There isn’t a moral module that is there innately.”
    However, she conceded that “the elements that underpin morality — altruism, sympathy for others, the understanding of others’ goals — are in place much earlier than we thought, and clearly in place before the children turn 2.”
    However secular scientists scramble to explain away the results of these experiments, I cannot help feeling a little amused and refreshed at modern researchers’ most recent contribution to science, confirming scientifically one tenet of our faith: that people are born with a sense of right and wrong.
    I am not sorry I succumbed to the lure of the provoking magazine cover, and, as I read, I could not help thinking that St. Albert the Great, patron saint of scientists, was smiling.

  • Kresta in the Afternoon – July 18, 2014 – Hour 1

    Kresta in the Afternoon – July 18, 2014 – Hour 1

    + Segment #1 of 3

    What's a Person to Do?: Everyday Decisions That Matter

    • Segment Guests:
      • Mark Latkovic
        Dr. Mark S. Latkovic (1963-) was born in Cleveland, OH and now lives in Allen Park, MI with his wife and four children. He obtained an M.A. degree from The Catholic University of America (Washington, DC) and S.T.L. and S.T.D. degrees from the Lateran University's Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family (Washington, DC "Session"). He is Professor of Moral Theology at Sacred Heart Major Seminary (Detroit, MI), where he has taught courses in fundamental and special moral theology since July 1990. He is the co-editor of "St. Thomas Aquinas & the Natural Law Tradition: Contemporary Perspectives" (The Catholic University of America Press, 2004) and "What's a Person to Do? Everyday Decisions that Matter" (Our Sunday Visitor, 2013), among many other publications in both scholarly and popular journals. He is a frequent speaker and consultant on moral issues and a member of many professional societies.
      • Resources:

    + Segment #2 of 3

    What's a Person to Do?: Everyday Decisions That Matter (continued)

    + Segment #3 of 3

    What's a Person to Do?: Everyday Decisions That Matter (continued)

  • Kresta in the Afternoon – July 18, 2014 – Hour 2

    Kresta in the Afternoon – July 18, 2014 – Hour 2

    + Segment #1 of 3

    “Heaven is For Real”

    • Description: Heaven Is for Real is the true story of a four-year old son of a small town Nebraska pastor who experienced heaven during emergency surgery. He talked about looking down to see the doctor operating and his dad praying in the waiting room. The family didn’t know what to believe but soon the evidence was clear. In heaven, Colton met his miscarried sister whom no one ever had told him about and his great-grandfather who died 30 years before Colton was born. He shared impossible-to-know details about each. We talk to the real life Todd Burpo, Colton’s father.
    • Segment Guests:

    + Segment #2 of 3

    What Works: Common Sense Solutions for a Stronger America

    • Description: Solutions ... not theories. Political progress ... not political posturing. Faith…not unbelief. Instead of the constant jockeying for political advantage, columnist Cal Thomas is here to focus on what promotes the general welfare, regardless of which party or ideology gets the credit. Thomas probes and provides answers to questions like, Why must we constantly fight the same battles over and over? Why don't we consult the past and use common sense in order to see that what others discovered long ago still works today? And why does present-day Washington too often look like the film Groundhog Day, with our elected officials waking up each day only to repeat identical talking points from previous days, months, and years? Cal joins us
    • Segment Guests:
      • Cal Thomas
        Cal Thomas has been observing the dysfunction in Washington for thirty years in one of the most popular syndicated columns in the country. He writes the Common Ground column for USA Today (with his liberal Democrat friend, Bob Beckel) and regularly appears on Fox News. He began his career in radio-TV-and print at the age of 16. 2014 marks the 30th anniversary of his syndicated column.
      • Resources:
        • Book(s):

    + Segment #3 of 3

    What Works: Common Sense Solutions for a Stronger America (continued)

  • Sam-I-Am and the New Evangelization

    via Catholic Stand

    by Denise Hunnel, MD

    denise hunnellFor several years now we have been hearing about the New Evangelization. It seems to mean different things to different people. There are some who view it as the fruit of Cardinal Ratzinger’s 1969 statement, “The church will become small and will have to start afresh more or less from the beginning.” Since Cardinal Ratzinger eventually became Pope Benedict XVI these same people feel justified in trying to purge and purify the Church. It is time to kick out those “Cafeteria Catholics” and hand out those excommunications. To them the New Evangelization means holding up the Catechism and all those who are not in conformity will be shown the door.

    Yet if you read the full text of Cardinal Ratzinger ‘s statement, it is clear he is not advocating the expulsion of people from the Church because they are not Catholic enough. He is talking about the Church refocusing on her doctrine and her raison d’etre. She will be less concerned with the politics of the world and more centered on her Bridegroom, Jesus Christ. Some will find the truth of the Catholic Church very hard. They will walk away because her teachings are too challenging for their worldly sensibilities. However, their departure is not something to be hoped for, but rather to be mourned. The New Evangelization is a call to draw these lost sheep home.

    With the election of Pope Francis there are now people who see the New
    Evangelization as offering an unqualified open door to the Church. They have grabbed on to the phrase, “Who am I to judge?” and declare everyone is welcome just as they are. It is true that Pope Francis is calling everyone home, sinners and saints alike. However, he never describes the Church as the big tent at the garden party to which everyone is invited. Instead, he calls it a field hospital. That means that those who come to the Church are wounded in some way and need healing. They are called to conversion. We are all sinners and the Church invites us to allow the Divine Physician to cut out our cancerous sins so that we may feel the therapeutic power of Divine Mercy. The New Evangelization does not invite us to accept and embrace our sins, but rather offers hope that no sin is beyond reconciliation with Christ.

    So the New Evangelization is not about kicking people out of the Church nor is it about condoning all sins as just part of a person’s identity. It is about stating firmly the truth of the Gospel revealed through the Church and welcoming all, no matter their sins or vices, to give Christ and his Church a try.

    I think we should approach the New Evangelization like Sam-I-Am from thesam i am classic children’s book, Green Eggs and Ham. Sam-I-Am tries desperately to convince someone to try a taste of green eggs and ham. When the offer is refused, Sam-I-Am does not say, “Well, if you won’t eat green eggs and ham, let me offer you something else. Maybe you would like bacon instead.” No. He persistently and cheerfully offers only green eggs and ham but in an array of different conditions—in a box, with a fox, on a train, in the rain. Eventually, the other character gives in and takes a bite. And he finds out he really likes green eggs and ham!

    The New Evangelization calls us to do the same. We are going to offer Catholicism in all its beauty and with all its challenges. There is no watering it down or offering a modified version that is easier to swallow. The truth is the truth. But what we can do is bring people in to the Church one small bite at a time. They may not be ready to chow down on the teachings about marriage, sexuality, an all male priesthood, the veneration of Mary, and the intercession of the saints. But a beautiful liturgy might draw them in to sample a little bit of the Church.

    You probably know a fallen away Catholic who hasn’t been to Mass in years. He is a lost soul waiting to be found. Maybe inviting him to Mass is too big of a bite. Invite him to vespers or a holy hour instead. Why don’t you ask him to volunteer with you at a Catholic charity? Let him see the loving side of the Church. Don’t be afraid to let him know that you said a Rosary for him or asked the intercession of a saint for his intention. The Divine Mercy Chaplet can be comforting to Catholics and non-Catholics alike. Our Catholic prayers are wonderful tools of evangelization. A priest in my diocese is welcoming a local farmers market to set up in the parish parking lot one day a week. Just bringing people on the church property may prompt an interest in what the Church is all about or rekindle the flame of faith in a lapsed Catholic.

    The New Evangelization also calls us to strengthen our own faith. We cannot share what we do not have. No one has ever maxed out his understanding of Christ on this side of Heaven. We must continuously strive to radiate the joy of the Gospel. We should positively glow with the peaceful calm anchored in faith. A loving and patient demeanor will entice others to give the Church a try far more than will shrill, bitter declarations.

    Like Sam-I-Am, we only have one option on our menu, the Catholic Church as the one true church founded by Christ. There is no one who is unworthy to hear her message of salvation through Jesus Christ. Sometimes we just have to channel Sam-I-Am and get creative so they will listen. That is the challenge of the New Evangelization.

YouTube Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Podcast